Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Williams
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Arnaldo Mercado, Scott Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Gulati et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jackson
Defendant:
Prem Gulati, Ruth Naglich, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Gulati et al (INMATE 2)
as 5:2020cv01924
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jackson
Defendant:
Prem Gulati, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Crestwood Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne-Bey v. Ivey et al
as 2:2019cv01451
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Kay Ivey, Cheryl Price and others
Plaintiff:
Darrow Bernard Payne-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne-Bey v. Price et al
as 2:2018cv02054
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Ruth Naglich, Asst Warden Cheryl Price and others
Plaintiff:
Darrow Payne-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Price et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv02057
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Ruth Naglich and Cheryl Price
Plaintiff:
Darrow Payne and Darrow Payne-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv01025
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, David E Gay, Jr, Terry T. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv00837
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv00565
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Corizon Medical Service et al
as 6:2016cv01942
Plaintiff:
Roy M Cannon
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Service, Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
