Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Vincent James Biagas v. R. C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv03877
Petitioner: Vincent James Biagas
Respondent: R. C. Johnson and S. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1458
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vincent Cannady v. MO Dept. of Mental Health, et al
as 22-1991
Plaintiff / Appellant: Vincent Cannady
Defendant / Appellee: Missouri Department of Mental Health, Brian C. Wimes, Office of Administration and others
Defendant: David S Baker, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, Hugh C. Jenkins and others
Lee et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv02353
Plaintiff: Anita Lynn Lee, Brian W. Murrell, Cecilia Singletary and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Burge v. Dixon et al
as 5:2022cv00141
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Burge
Defendant: Ricky Dixon, Centurion of Florida, MHM Health Professionals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Bell Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 6:2022cv00049
Plaintiff: Glenn S. Baker
Defendant: Bell Co. Sheriff Dept., D.O.C., Bell Co. Forestry Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Seely
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff: Jamall S Baker
Defendant: Jeremy Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rune Kraft v. CRH PLC et al
as 2:2021cv09014
Plaintiff: Rune Kraft
Defendant: CRH plc, CRH Americas Incorporated, CRH Americas Materials Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McCoy v. Baker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00560
Plaintiff: Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant: S Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01052
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?