Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jenkins v. Tahmahkera et al
as 4:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Shanelle Jenkins
Defendant:
Michael Tahmahkera, Jordan Beene, Jason Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe v. Richardson et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
Warden Kendall T Richardson, Jennifer S Brown, Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. Expansion Cell Block et al
as 7:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
Expansion Cell Block, Larry D Goatley, Jr., David E Petges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Cascos
as 6:2016cv00457
Defendant:
Carlos H. Cascos
Plaintiff:
Ryan S. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander et al v. Linthicum et al
as 7:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Darrold L Alexander and Marcus S Rhodes
Defendant:
Phyllis McWhorter, Tommy L. Norwood, Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Murray et al
as 7:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Moses, Sr
Defendant:
Leonard S Murray, Lisa S James, Robert B Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horace v. Blevins et al
as 7:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lynell Horace
Defendant:
Dolores Thornton and Lisa S James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. James et al
as 7:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Danny Duffy
Defendant:
Lisa S James, Eddie C. Williams, Angela N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow et al v. Oklahoma Investigative Group
as 4:2011cv00683
Plaintiff:
Tami S Morrow , Heath S James and Sandra K Fuller
Defendant:
Oklahoma Investigative Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
James et al v. Harlingen Family Dentistry, Series, PLLC et al
as 7:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Haydn J. James , Mary L. James and Katrina S. James
Defendant:
Harlingen Family Dentistry, Series PLLC and Juan D. Villareal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
