Cases 41 - 50 of 70
HERNANDEZ v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00356
Petitioner:
BENITO HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00349
Petitioner:
MAURICE JACKSON
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUNCAN v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00346
Petitioner:
CRISS E. DUNCAN
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00347
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Petitioner:
KEION LAMONE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas Bates v. DOJ, et al
as 16-3292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGION FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and others
Thomas Bates v. DOJ, et al
as 16-3037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGION FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and others
WOODWARD v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00304
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, S. JULIAN and WARDEN
Petitioner:
ELLO MITCHELL WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas Bates v. DOJ, et al
as 16-2888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGION FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and others
JAHNS v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00239
Petitioner:
JASON JAHNS
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CIRCLE SEVEN EL-RUKN et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ORTHODOX ISLAM, THOMAS L. BATES and CIRCLE SEVEN EL-RUKN
Defendant:
M. CAULTON, J. D. EDWARDS, M. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
