Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Roldan v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity et al
as 2:2024cv03483
Plaintiff: Jhonny Roldan
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, a public entity, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roldan v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2024cv03485
Plaintiff: Jhonny Roldan
Defendant: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15705
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alyse Kisty et al v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00427
Plaintiff: SLYVIA KOUCHOCK, Alyse Kisty, Kai Kisty and others
Defendant: AvalonBay Communities, Inc., ASN Calabasas I and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
J. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-16695
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Abd-Rahmaan v. Wahikoa et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00443
Plaintiff: Khatib M. Abd-Rahmaan
Defendant: Celia Wahikoa, Daniel S. K. Kawakami and Neal Wagatsuma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent: JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant: GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?