Cases 1 - 10 of 17
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CARLISLE et al
as 3:2017cv00659
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARLISLE, CHAKA MONCHERE DIXON, JAKETRA BONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Barberi v. Marble Design Collection, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv25014
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Marble Design Collection, Inc. and S K Sime Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv80156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Herbs Unlimited, Inc. v. S&K Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv20131
Plaintiff:
Herbs Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
S&K Enterprises, Inc., Kimberly S. Hinkle and Stanley G. Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
ROBENSON v. MCCRANIE et al
as 3:2014cv00443
Plaintiff:
LOUIS ROBENSON
Defendant:
J MCCRANIE, S K ENFINGER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGS v. GIELOW
as 3:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS
Defendant:
W L GIELOW, M ALLEN, A BEASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv21130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
BROWN v. COMERFORD et al
as 3:2013cv00572
Plaintiff:
JOE BROWN
Defendant:
RICHARD COMERFORD, S K ENFINGER, GIELOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanguard High School Gay-Straight Alliance et al v. Yancey et al
as 5:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Vanguard High School Gay-Straight Alliance , S. K. and D. L.
Defendant:
Jim Yancey and School Board for Marion County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Union Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2011cv01275
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Union Correctional Institution, V-Dorm Security, Food Service Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
