Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KING v. BRANHAM et al
as 1:2021cv03008
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. KING, JR.
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, ANDREW VERBOCHT, JOHN COCHRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYFIELD v. BURRIS et al
as 2:2020cv00140
Defendant:
CODY BURRIS, RICHARD BROWN, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MAYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2013cv00069
Defendant:
ADAMS, S. ARONLD, BARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL LEVON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2013cv00056
Defendant:
R. BROWN, DAVIS, M. GADBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL LEVON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLEMAN v. MARK et al
as 2:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Defendant:
Lt. S. KING, MATT LEOHR, T. MARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNARY v. HUSTON et al
as 2:2011cv00131
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, D. BROUGH, JERRY HUSTON and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL McNARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Levanhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Vaughn
Defendant:
Superintendent Levanhagen, K Mapps, S Hert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROMINGER v. BROCK et al
as 2:2010cv00158
Defendant:
J. BASSINGER, E. BROCK, D. BROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLEMAN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00339
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOLLEMAN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILSON v. FINNAN et al
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
SHAVAUGHN CARLOS WILSON
Defendant:
A. FINNAN, C.A. PENFOLD, S. KING and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
