Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Alexander et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2011at00323
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Nicholas Alexander , Estate of Jonathan Alexander, by and through it personal representative Jonathan Nicholas Alexander and Amber Dawn Alexander
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwartzenegger, Former Governor of California, Deuel Vocational Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander, et al v. CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al
as 2:2011cv00640
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Nicholas Alexander and Amber Dawn Alexander
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Deuel Vocational Institution, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. Heinrich et al
as 2:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
Larry W. Kirk
Defendant:
Heinrich and S. M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Salinas
as 2:2011cv00252
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Phillips
Respondent:
S. M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Salinas
as 1:2010cv02325
Petitioner:
Juan Ignacio Lopez
Respondent:
S. M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Salinas
as 2:2010cv03165
Petitioner:
Juan Ignacio Lopez
Respondent:
S. M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelvin Williams v. S. Salina
as 10-17401
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELVIN LANCE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
S. M. SALINAS
Kevin Williams v. S. Salina
as 10-73203
Petitioner:
KEVIN LANCE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
S. M. SALINAS, Warden
Whitmore v. Salinas et al
as 2:2010cv02488
Petitioner:
Isreal Whitmore
Respondent:
S. M. Salinas and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dock McNeely v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 10-16796
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOCK MCNEELY
Respondent - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, S. M. SALINAS, MANESS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
