Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Daniel v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Brant Q. Daniel and Brant Q Daniel
Defendant:
Jeffery Lynch, S. Ramirez, K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cortinas v. Gates et al
as 2:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Conall McCabe, Dave Davey, R. Pham and others
Plaintiff:
Larry William Cortinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobley v. Baker et al
as 2:2015cv01260
Plaintiff:
Leon Durell Hobley
Defendant:
E. Baker, S. Ramirez, J. Mayhew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Baker et al
as 2:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
Donald Williams
Defendant:
E. Baker, S. Ramirez, Tim V. Virga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. People of the State of California
as 2:2014cv01016
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Ramirez
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. People of the State of California
as 2:2014cv00832
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Ramirez
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alford v. Dang, et al.
as 2:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Tracy Fidel Alford
Defendant:
Lam Dang, Jones, J. Clough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Deutsche Bank As Trustee et al
as 1:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Honorio S. Ramirez
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank As Trustee, JP Morgan Chase NA , Long Beach Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Honoro S Ramirez
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
RAMIREZ v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013at00137
Plaintiff:
HONORIO S RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Caliofornia Reconveyance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
