Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Munoz v. Gipson et al
as 4:2021cv07176
Plaintiff:
Abraham Dionicio Munoz
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Ralph Diaz, Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Easter v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01227
Plaintiff:
Derryl Easter
Defendant:
S. Smith, S. Swaim and E. Stark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberson v. Farmbrough et al
as 1:2021cv00990
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, S. Furlong, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Plaintiff:
Morris Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etuate Sekona v. Raquel Trujillo, et al
as 20-17500
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA FAULKNER, CCII at KVSP, SILLAS, RAQUEL TRUJILLO, Correctional Counselor at KVSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETUATE SEKONA
(PC) Sekona v. Trujillo et al
as 1:2019cv00399
Defendant:
Raquel Trujillo, John Marques, Rigoberto Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Etuate Sekona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Oden, Sr. v. J. Acebedo, et al
as 19-55180
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ACEBEDO, L. PARKER, (CSPR), Official and Individual Capacity, R. KNOWLES, Captain, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ANTHONY GROUNDS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK JESUS ODEN, Sr.
Derrick Oden, Sr. v. J. Acebedo, et al
as 19-15052
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK JESUS ODEN, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ACEBEDO, S. SWAIM and R. THOMAS
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ANTHONY GROUNDS
Derrick Jesus Oden v. State of California, et al.
as 2:2017cv05639
Defendant:
J. Acebedo, Anthony Grounds, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jesus Oden, Sr
Bland v. Commissioner et al
as 1:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Bland
Defendant:
Commissioner, M. D. Biter, S. Swaim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden v. Director of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01286
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jesus Oden
Defendant:
Director of Corrections, Howls, Kelly Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
