Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Key v. Vallely
as 1:2023cv00386
Counter Defendant:
H. Reid Key
Plaintiff:
Kristen F. Key
Defendant:
Chantelle S. Vallely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Valle v. 215 Soho Cafe Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv03475
Defendant:
Rene Brown, 215 Soho Cafe Corp., 8312 Soho Cafe Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelsey S Valle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
VALLE v. SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS et al
as 2:2016cv01811
Petitioner:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY CO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOHN TOWNSON DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VALLE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NORTHAMPTON CO.
as 5:2014cv06590
Petitioner:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NORTHAMPTON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
VALLE v. MELHAM
as 5:2011cv06145
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Defendant:
JOHN MELHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALLE v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2011cv05570
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, NOTRHAMPTON COUNTY COURTHOUSE CRIMINAL DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALLE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA
as 2:2011cv05511
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO S VALLE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALLE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 5:2011cv05343
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
