Cases 1 - 10 of 143
WAGNER v. Ungerer & Company et al
as 5:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
KELSEY WAGNER
Defendant:
Ungerer & Company and Givaudan, SA.
WAGNER v. Ungerer & Company et al
as 2:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
KELSEY WAGNER
Defendant:
Ungerer & Company and Givaudan, SA.
MARLIN LEASING COMPANY v. SAS MFG., INC.
as 2:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
MARLIN LEASING COMPANY
Defendant:
SAS MFG., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
MONTGOMERY v. BOBST MEX SA et al
as 2:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
TABRIA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
BOBST MEX SA, BOBST GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC., GRAPHIC PACKAGING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kowalick v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 3:2023cv01857
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi SA, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Kowalick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
A.B. v. WYNDHAM HOTEL & RESORTS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03896
Plaintiff:
a. b. and A.B.
Defendant:
OM SRI SA, INC. d/b/a Howard Johnson by Wyndham Bartonsville/Poconos Area, WYNDHAM HOTEL AND RESORTS and OM SRI SA, INC. doing business as HOWARD JOHNSON BY WYNDHAM BARTONSVILLE/POCONOS AREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A.B. v. WYNDHAM HOTEL & RESORTS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03902
Plaintiff:
A.B.
Defendant:
WYNDAM HOTEL & RESORTS, INC. and OM SRI SA, INC. doing business as HOWARD JOHNSON BY WYNDHAM BARTONSVILLE/POCONOS AREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Prater v. SA Piper Logistics
as 4:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
David Prater
Defendant:
SA Piper Logistics
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A SIG SAUER P938 SAS 9mm PISTOL et al
as 2:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
A SIG SAUER P938 SAS 9mm PISTOL and A SIG SAUER MAGAZINE WITH SEVEN 9mm ROUNDS OF ASSOCIATED AMMUNITION
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
