Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-3811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. BENEVIDAZ, Warden, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden and others
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Dennis Schantzen Consulting Engineer P.C. et al
as 3:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dennis Schantzen Consulting Engineer P.C., CNA Financial Corp., Justin Rothgeb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
(PC) Mitchell v. CDCR et al
as 2:2022cv02232
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the State of California, Mule Creek Prison, J Benevidaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sackett v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv06081
Plaintiff:
Harvey P. Sackett
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jerry Young v. Patrick Covello, et al
as 22-16496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO, E. SACKETT, R. DENNISTAN and others
Jerry Young v. Patrick Covello, et al
as 22-15747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO, E. SACKETT, R. DENNISTAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00991
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sackett v, Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00653
Petitioner:
Harvey P. Sackett
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Young v. Covello, et al.
as 2:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Young
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E Sackett, R Dennistan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Covello
as 3:2021cv09822
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Young
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello, E Sackett, R Dennistan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
