Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Young et al v Saginaw County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv11806
Plaintiff:
Shanell Young, Aisha Young and Natasha Young
Defendant:
Christopher Bonnington and Saginaw County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Adams v. USA, et al
as 24-1429
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, SAGINAW COUNTY, MI BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
White v. County of et al
as 2:2024cv10627
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Saginaw, County of and John Colgan
Adams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10562
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Defendant:
United States of America, Michigan, State of, Saginaw, County of and others
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Saginaw County Republican Committee v. Roy et al
as 1:2023cv13228
Plaintiff:
Saginaw County Republican Committee and Saginaw County Republican Party
Defendant:
Thomas Roy, Janet Stoney and R. Scott Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kreh v. Saginaw, County of et al
as 2:2023cv12137
Plaintiff:
Bryce Kreh
Defendant:
Saginaw, County of, Saginaw County Community Mental Health, Saginaw County Sheriff Office and others
Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv11951
Plaintiff:
Airrick Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, 70th Judicial District Court, Saginaw County Landbanking Authorities and others
Jeffery Capen v. Saginaw County, MI, et al
as 23-1665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY CAPEN
Defendant / Appellee:
SAGINAW COUNTY, MI and ROBERT V. BELLEMAN
Mark White v. MDOC, et al
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DENTIST SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
