Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mullins v. Powers et al
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mullins
Defendant:
Samantha Powers, Kent J Dawson, Judge, Joseph Went and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mack v. USA
as 23-60558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joy Mack, Others so Affected
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, HHS Office for Human Research Protections, and OHRP Director Dr. Jerry A. Menikoff and others
Denise Lamaute v. Samantha Power
as 23-5209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Denise Lamaute
Defendant / Appellee:
Samantha Power, Administrator, United States Agency for International Development
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Emilio Estevez
Defendant:
Samantha Power, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Jason M. Frierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
