Cases 1 - 7 of 7
EX PARTE APPLICATION OF SANDOZ CANADA INC.
as 3:2020cv02425
Petitioner:
SANDOZ CANADA INC.
In Re:
EX PARTE APPLICATION OF SANDOZ CANADA INC.
Cause Of Action: Letter rogatory - appointment
LEHIGH VALLEY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03676
Plaintiff:
LEHIGH VALLEY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , ENDO GLOBAL VENTURES , ENDO VENTURES LIMITED
and others
Defendant:
SANDOZ, INC., UPSHER-SMITH LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Leonard Cottrell, et al v. Alcon Laboratories, et al
as 16-2015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD COTTRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCON LABORATORIES, ALCON RESEARCH LTD, FALCON PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
and others
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN v. ACTAVIS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN
Defendant:
APOTEX CORP. , DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD., FOREST LABORATORIES, INC.
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
COTTRELL et al v. ALCON LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv05859
Plaintiff:
LEONARD COTTRELL , SANDRA HENON , WILLIAM REEVES
and others
Defendant:
ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH, LTD., FALCON PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv04594
Plaintiff:
SANDOZ INC. , MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., INTERNATIONAL MEDICATION SYSTEMS, LTD., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
and others
Respondent:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC , WINTHROP U.S.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv01866
Petitioner:
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC., STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., MEIJER, INC.
and others
Respondent:
SANDOZ, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
