Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wood v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Erica Saxton, Danielle Tope, Medical Department/Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sax et al v. Lucky 8 TV, LLC
as 1:2019cv08187
Defendant:
Lucky 8 TV, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandy Phillips-Johnson and Erin Sax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Saxe v. Applied Robotics, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
Walter Saxe
Defendant:
Applied Robotics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lombardy v. The Office of Court Administration et al
as 1:2015cv06934
Plaintiff:
William J. Lombardy
Defendant:
The Office of Court Administration, Peter H. Moulton, Paul Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Passarinho et al v. Handybrook, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03984
Plaintiff:
Dinis Passarinho and Andrew E. Saxe
Defendant:
Handybrook, Inc., Oisin Hanrahan, Umang Dua and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04901
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Tardio v. New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06619
Plaintiff:
Julio Tardio
Defendant:
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc., Louis T. Hsieh and Michael Minhong Yu
Movant:
Jennifer Sax , Matthew Gabel and Kin Shing Wong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sax v. New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05724
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sax
Defendant:
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc., Michael Minhong Yu and Louis T. Hsieh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Micha-El Bey v. Jamaica Realty LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02141
Defendant:
George Essock, Scott D. Gross, Jamaica Realty LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lindon David Micha-El Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02873
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
