Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Clifton Williams v. George Little, et al
as 24-1903
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, Unknown (Former Sec'y PA Dept. of Corrections (DOC)), LAUREL HARRY, Secretary PA Department of Corrections (DOC), KERI MOORE, Acting DOC Chief Grievance Officer and others
Muhammad v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
Walid A. Muhammad
Respondent:
CO Scott, Warden of SCI-Mahanoy and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 2:2024cv01716
Petitioner:
WALLACE JONES
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Mahanoy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
Wallace Jones
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Mahanoy and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roche v. SCI-Mahanoy RHU et al
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
James Roche
Defendant:
SCI-Mahanoy RHU, Department of Correction Facility, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Nelson v. Marissa Redick
as 24-1087
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant:
MARISSA REDICK, SCI-Mahanoy
Kareem Blount v. B. Mason, et al
as 23-2835
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM BLOUNT
Defendant / Appellee:
B. MASON, Superintendent SCI- Mahanoy, HEENAN, Unit Manager, L. WHITE and others
Michael Nelson v. Mroczka
as 23-2711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MROCZKA, Psychologist assigned to H-Block of SCI-Mahanoy
Michael Nelson v. Mroczka
as 23-2648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MROCZKA, Psychologist assigned to H-Block of SCI-Mahanoy
Michael Nelson v. Mroczka
as 23-2547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MROCZKA, Psychologist assigned to H-Block of SCI-Mahanoy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
