Cases 1 - 10 of 937
Chappel v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Todd Chappel
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldrello v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00268
Defendant:
Brock Scott, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra V. Caldrello
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Alvarado v. Maldenado et al
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alvarado
Defendant:
Maldenado, Rich Hardy, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duva v. Camping World RV Sales, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Scott Duva
Defendant:
Camping World RV Sales, LLC doing business as Camping World RV Sales, Thor Industries, Inc. and Jayco, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Brown v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Brown
Defendant:
Edward Maldonado, Kevin Roy and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grande et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Karen Grande and Janine Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Martquice T. Dukes
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Davis
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Dayvid Jimenez
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
