Cases 11 - 20 of 1,410
United States v. Shepherd
as 24-6054
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
COLBY SCOTT SHEPHERD, AKA Colby Scott Shephard
Scott v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Shannon Latarion Scott
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newman (PS) v. Polis et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Scott Newman
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Moses Andre Stancil, William Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Reheard
as 6:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Brian Tyrone Scott
Respondent:
Deborah A. Reheard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey (PS) v. Lengerich et al
as 1:2024cv00631
Petitioner:
Kenneth Scott Casey
Respondent:
Jason Lengerich and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Nicholas Scott Poe
Respondent:
State of Utah and Board of Pardons and Parole
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
