Cases 1 - 10 of 957
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GERMANY v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
TYRONE GERMANY
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANTHONY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
SCOTT ANTHONY
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Anders et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
N.W. Anders, C. Pittsinger, Ms. Sheffield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
