Cases 31 - 40 of 14,005
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Soto v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Soto
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hanson v. Dowling et al
as 4:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Christina J. Hanson
Defendant:
Charles D. Dowling, Jim Gaines, Scott Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Floyd Scott v. J. Fernald et al
as 2:2024cv01960
Plaintiff:
Floyd Dewaine Scott
Defendant:
J. Fernald, J. Varela, A. F. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
The People of the State of California v. Dylan Perry et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California and Dylan Scott Perry
Defendant:
Board and CEO of Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County doing business as L.A. Care Health Plan doing business as L.A. Care Plan de Salud and The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Scott v. Rodriguez
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott
Defendant:
Deputy R. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. LT Mccay et al
as 4:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
James Scott
Defendant:
LT Mccay and Sergeant Dominquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
