Cases 31 - 40 of 281
Primous v. Arizona Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv02057
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Primous
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Education, Sean Ross and Scott Hinderliter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala D Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Monroe, County of et al
as 2:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Monroe, County of, Maricopa, County of and Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 4:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Air National Guard et al
as 2:2023cv01666
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Air National Guard, NASA and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, American Bar Association, American Board of Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Universal Music Group et al
as 2:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Universal Music Group and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Desert Financial Credit Union et al
as 2:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Desert Financial Credit Union and Abigale Guzmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
