Cases 21 - 30 of 2,038
Marselis v. Fox Factory Holding Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Ryan Marselis
Defendant:
Fox Factory Holding Corp., Michael C. Dennison, Dennis C. Schemm and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Middlebrooks v. Kasmar et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Sergeant Scott Kasmar, Major Chris DeHart, Private First Class Chris Ridling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Davis v. Richmond Honan Development and Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Randy Davis
Defendant:
Richmond Honan Development and Acquisitions, LLC and Scott Honan
SLAM Mechanical, LLC v. Royal Flush Plumbing, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
SLAM Mechanical, LLC and Scott Jenkins
Defendant:
Royal Flush Plumbing, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Jeff Konzal, Austin Redman and Logan Webb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Scott
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Tasheika A. Washington
Defendant:
Judge Jewel C. Scott
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
