Cases 11 - 20 of 443
Scott v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 1:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adkins v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00653
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Adkins
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxey Jr. v. Bondurant et al
as 1:2023cv01388
Petitioner:
Robert S. Maxey Jr.
Respondent:
Elliott B. Bondurant, Scott T. Renick and Melanie Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newkirk v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Lt. KM Fleming, Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Stevenson et al
as 7:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Scott
Defendant:
Mrs. Stevenson, Dudley and T. Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. White
as 1:2023cv01141
Petitioner:
Tracey Scott Hughes
Respondent:
Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Weaver et al
as 3:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik Weaver, Sarah McKnight, Scott Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gurley v. Scott County Circuit Court et al
as 7:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Ryan W. Gurley
Defendant:
Scott County Circuit Court, Duffield Regional Jail and Julia Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Levy et al
as 2:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Stephen Scott Mitchell
Defendant:
Dr. Marion Levy, Dr. Michael Rao and Michael Roussos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
