Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McMillian v. Londrigan et al
as 9:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Mollie Victoria-Lee McMillan
Defendant:
Paige Londrigan, Eric Rich, Zackery Plude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benninger v. Hoyt et al
as 3:2017cv00985
Plaintiff:
Timathy A. Benninger
Defendant:
Rick Hoyt, Scott Cook and Aaron Palm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benninger v. Hoyt et al
as 9:2017cv00985
Plaintiff:
Timathy A. Benninger
Defendant:
Rick Hoyt, Scott Cook and Aaron Palm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Hoyt et al
as 3:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
John Newman
Defendant:
Rick Hoyt and Scott Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Cook et al
as 1:2011cv05926
Plaintiff:
George Ball
Defendant:
R. Scott Cook , Soussan A.E. Cook , Cook Fine Art, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. The Coca-Cola Company et al
as 1:2011cv00925
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Armada and Scott Cook
Defendant:
Energy Brands, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company
Glaceau Vitaminwater Marketing and Sales Practice Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2011md02215
Plaintiff:
Batsheva Ackerman, Ruslan Antonov, Nicholas Armada and others
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of the Virgin Islands, Coca-Cola Company, Culusvi, Inc. D/B/A Cost-U-Less and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eufaula Drugs, Inc. et al v. TDI Managed Care Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2008mc06024
Plaintiff:
Eufaula Drugs, Inc., Eufaula Drugs, Inc., Scott-Cook, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TDI Managed Care Services, Inc. and Eckerd Health Services
Manhattan Properties I, LLC v. Cook et al
as 1:2008cv05288
Plaintiff:
Manhattan Properties I, LLC and Manhattan Properties I, LLC
Defendant:
Scott Cook, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
