Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
In re: Shirley
as 24-6055
Petitioner: ROBERT ALLEN SHIRLEY
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director of O.D.D.C.
Nash v. Crow
as 23-7034
Petitioner / Appellant: ROGER DANIEL NASH
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director
Cyr v. Crow
as 23-6020
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH R. CYR
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Dunn v. Crow, et al
as 22-6142
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL R. DUNN
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director and RICK WHITTEN, Warden
Parker v. Crow
as 22-6047
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALVIN PARKER
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Mitchell v. Crow
as 21-6157
Petitioner / Appellant: IMMANUEL GERALD DEAN MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, et al
as 21-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant: WADE LAY
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCOTT CROW, Director of ODOC and others
Ray v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-51068
Petitioner / Appellant: Eric S. Ray
Respondent / Appellee: Scott Crow, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant: WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified: BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee: ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant: JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae: ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
In re: Starr
as 21-5065
Petitioner: DANIEL PAUL STARR
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?