Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Diaz et al v. Scott Fischer Enterprises, et al
as 1:2015cv00671
Plaintiff:
Julia Diaz
Defendant:
Scott Fischer Enterprises , Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc., Harley-Davidson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beicker, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID STRUMILLO, JIM BEICKER, Sheriff of Fremont County, RICK BESECKER, Sheriff of Gunnison County and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado
Beicker, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MINOR, Sheriff of Summit County, GABRIEL DAVID JOINER, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, TONY SPURLOCK, Sheriff of Douglas County and others
Amicus Curiae:
LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, STATE OF MARYLAND, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado
Colorado Outfitters Association et al v. Hickenlooper
as 1:2013cv01300
Plaintiff:
John B. Cooke , Terry Maketa , Justin Smith and others
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pullen, v. Fischer, et al.,
as 1:2012cv02129
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ilene Pullen
Defendant:
Scott Fischer, Stephen Holland, Rex Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrell v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00393
Plaintiff:
Darlene Burrell
Defendant:
John Green , Harley-Davidson, Inc. , Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust
Defendant:
MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah, THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant-Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan (Intervenors' Appeal), et al
as 11-4072
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah, THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus, et al v. Wisan (Horne Appeal), et al
as 11-4071
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Movant:
HARKER DAIRY FARM and JONATHAN HARKER
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus, et al v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah and THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Movant:
JONATHAN HARKER, HYRUM HARKER and HARKER DAIRY FARM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
