Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Sellers v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Donnie Mack Sellers
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Kristy Cobban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 23-4077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Smith v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Justin Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Scott McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreves v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Crystal Thompson, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Montana State Prison et al
as 6:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Montana State Prison, Montana D.O.C., Billie Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Clary v. Reginald Michaels, et al
as 21-35107
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTY COBBAN, JIM SALMONSON, MONTANA PACIFIC QUALITY HEALTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES CLARY
Clary v. Michaels et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Sgt. Quinn, Paul Rees, D Unit Manager Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Clary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26649
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER SCOTT MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
