Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Assoc. of Battery Recyclers v. EPA, et al
as 12-1373
Petitioner: Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Frisco Unleaded and others
Respondent: Lisa Perez Jackson, Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy and others
Intervenor: RSR Corporation
National Farmers Union v. EPA, et al
as 16-1056
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator
Amicus Curiae: Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition, American Soybean Association and others
Intervenor: U.S. Oil & Refining Co., Valero Energy Corporation, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and others
Petitioner: National Farmers Union
Americans for Clean Energy, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1005
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator
Intervenor: American Petroleum Institute, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, U.S. Oil & Refining Co. and others
Amicus Curiae: Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition, Arvegenix, Inc. and others
Petitioner: National Sorghum Producers, Growth Energy, National Corn Growers Association and others
American Petroleum Institute v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 16-1050
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy and E. Scott Pruitt
Amicus Curiae: Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition, Arvegenix, Inc. and others
Intervenor: Growth Energy, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, U.S. Oil & Refining Co. and others
Petitioner: American Petroleum Institute
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
Oak Grove Management Company v. EPA, et al
as 16-1206
Petitioner: Oak Grove Management Company, LLC
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae: Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 16-1127
Intervenor: American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, State of California and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, Gina McCarthy and others
Amicus Curiae: Robert P. Mason, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, Joel D. Blum and others
Petitioner: Murray Energy Corporation
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. E. SCOTT PRUITT et al Featured Case
as 1:2018cv00773
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK , STATE OF CALIFORNIA , STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: E. SCOTT PRUITT and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
KOENIG v. PRUITT et al
as 1:2018cv01169
Plaintiff: LA VERNE KOENIG
Defendant: E. SCOTT PRUITT, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON et al v. PRUITT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00406
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant: SCOTT PRUITT, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, DAVID S. FERRIERO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?