Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(SS) Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rukhsana Mir et al v. City of Torrance et al
as 2:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Scott Mathews, Leo Oorts, Thomas M. Fallo and others
Plaintiff:
Jehan Zeb Mir, MD, Rukhsana Mir and Jehan Zeb Mir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McAlpin v. McDonald
as 3:2012cv06015
Petitioner:
Scott Thomas McAlpin
Respondent:
M. D. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fair Housing of Marin v. Thomas et al
as 3:2010cv04856
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing of Marin
Defendant:
Robert Scott Thomas and Jean Paul Jurdo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
David A. Gill v. Bruce F. Friedman et al
as 2:2010cv01554
Plaintiff:
David A. Gill
Defendant:
Bruce F. Friedman, Karen O'Callaghan, Diane Marie Cano and others
Not Classified By Court:
Oren Cohen, Shoshana Zalk Cohen and Plaza Home Mortgage Inc
Juan M Achan et al v. Los Angeles City of et al
as 2:2004cv04334
Plaintiff:
Juan M Achan, Daniel P Ackley, Stephen R Addleman and others
Defendant:
Defendant City of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Thomas et al v. Premier Recovery, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00587
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas and Katrina Thomas
Defendant:
Premier Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thomas et al v. Premier Recovery, Inc.
as 1:2008at00223
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas and Katrina Thomas
Defendant:
Premier Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
