Cases 1 - 10 of 25
State of Texas v. Garland
as 24-10386
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Charlotte A. Burrows, in her official capacity as Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Jocelyn Samuels, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
REYNA v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JAVIER REYNA
Defendant:
Joe Biden, United States Attorney General, IZAAK BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mithushan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00602
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Pathmakumar Mithushan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Surjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
