Cases 1 - 10 of 609
Navajo Nation, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-4466
Plaintiff:
NAVAJO NATION GAMING ENTERPRISE and NAVAJO NATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BRYAN BOWKER, Bryan Bowker in his official capacity as the Western Regional Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as the United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Movant:
HOPI TRIBE, Proposed Intervenor
Committee for Constructive Tomorrow, et al v. Department of Interior, et al
as 24-5151
Defendant:
Virginia Electric and Power Company, a utility corporation, doing business as Dominion Energy Virginia, United States Bureau of Ocean Management, Janet Coit, Director of the National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Plaintiff:
Heartland Institute, a non-profit corporation, Peter Flaherty, an individual, National Legal and Policy Center, a non-profit corporation and others
National Parks Conservation Association v. DOI, et al
as 24-5147
Defendant:
Charles F. Sams, III, in his Official Capacity as Director of the National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Plaintiff:
National Parks Conservation Association
Kurt Kanam, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 24-5121
Petitioner:
Kurt Kanam and Pilchuck Nation
Respondent:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, or his successor, U.S. Department of the Interior and Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, or her successor, U.S. Department of the Interior
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE et al v. HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, MILDRED FERN BURLEY, SILVIA FAWN BURLEY and others
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, BRYAN NEWLAND, AMY DUTSCHKE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Healthy Gulf, et al v. DOI, et al
as 24-1024
Petitioner:
Healthy Gulf, Friends of the Earth, Bayou City Waterkeeper and others
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
perkins et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
ronald oddelle perkins, Ronald Oddelle Perkins Estate et al., Kanika Glover Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, simon green ceo of the us dept. of ed. et al., United States Department of Education HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as SIMON GREEN, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Hill, et al v. DOI, et al
as 24-5011
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill, President, Jason Kills Pretty Enemy, Senator, Alee Birdhat and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant United States Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs and others
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
