Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Family Foot and Leg Center PA v. Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Family Foot and Leg Center PA
Defendant:
Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, NORTH ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER fka ELIZA COFFEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANDALUSIA HEALTH fka COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANDALUSIA and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Bridgeport Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bridgeport Hospital, doing business as Yale New Haven Health, Greenwich Hospital, Yale-New Haven Hospital and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Bridgeport Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bridgeport Hospital, doing business as Yale New Haven Health, Greenwich Hospital, Yale-New Haven Hospital and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Advocate Christ Medical Center, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Advocate Christ Medical Center, also known as Advocate Christian Hospotal, Advocate Condell Medical Center, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, also known as Advocate Nirthside Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT JAMES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services and XAVIER BECERRA
Petitioner:
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, INGALLS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM and NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
AFFINIS HOSPICE, LLC v. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2020cv03700
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
AFFINIS HOSPICE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Bethesda Health, Inc. et al v. Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 0:2020cv62206
Plaintiff:
Bethesda Health, Inc. doing business as Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Naples Community Hospital, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, II and Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Enloe Medical Center et al v. Alex M. Azar II
as 2:2020cv09278
Plaintiff:
County of Riverside doing business as Riverside University Health Systems-Medical Center also known as Riverside County Regional Medical Center, County of San Bernardino doing business as Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Good Samaritan Hospital, a California Limited Partnership doing business as Good Samaritan Hospital and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
