Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bowes-Northern v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc., et al
as 2:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc, Corie Barry, Andrew Bonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWES-NORTHERN v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC., et al
as 1:2021cv02617
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.,, CORIE BARRY, ANDREW BONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02086
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. DISABILITY PLAN and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KERNODLE v. THE 3M LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN et al
as 1:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KERNODLE
Defendant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and THE 3M LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hardinge Inc et al v. Emerson Transmission Power Company et al
as 2:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Hardinge Inc
Defendant:
Emerson Transmission Power Company and Emerson Transmission Power Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Gary Barneko and Gary Barneko
Respondent:
Emerson Power Transmission Corporation, Emerson Power Transmission Corporation, Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
GORDON v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00883
Plaintiff:
REBECCA L. GORDON
Defendant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., ASCENSION HEALTH, ST. VINCENT HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
