Cases 1 - 10 of 559
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
US Department of Labor, Acting Secretary of Labor v. Ulster Property Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
ULSTER PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC d/b/a ULSTER PROPERTY SERVICES and Kieran Rice
Burns v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Robert D Burns, Administrator of the Estate of Tami D. Burns
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sharps v. Shenzhen Tejiali Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jamie B Sharps and Jamie B. Sharps
Defendant:
Shenzhen Tejiali Technology Co., Ltd. and Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waugh v. Bishop & Buddha et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Nancy Waugh
Defendant:
Bishop & Buddha, The Horrocks Company, Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
