Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adil Boutahli v. 7-Eleven Inc, et al
as 20-2428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADIL BOUTAHLI
Defendant / Appellee:
7 ELEVEN INC, FEIL ORGANIZATION and NORTH BAY ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant:
SEVEN ELEVEN JAPAN CO LTD, SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO LTD, CHARLES L. WALLS and others
BOUTAHLI v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01186
Plaintiff:
ADIL BOUTAHLI
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN- ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD, SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO. LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOUTAHLI v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08826
Plaintiff:
ADIL BOUTAHLI
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC., SEVEN- ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD, SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO. LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nashibkuma Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 14-2359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NASHIBKUMA PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
7-ELEVEN, INC., a wholly-owned subsidary of Seven and I Holdings Co., Ltd.
MORALES v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
MARIO MORALES
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD., IBRAHIM A ISSA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MARROQUIN v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01609
Plaintiff:
BELNILDO MARROQUIN
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD., SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PATEL v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00827
Plaintiff:
MEHUL PATEL
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC., JOHN DOES 1-20, SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATALLA et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 1:2013cv04578
Plaintiff:
NEIL NAIK , HEMANG PATEL , JAYESH PATEL and others
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD. and SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ATALLA et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 3:2013cv04578
Plaintiff:
NEIL NAIK , HEMANG PATEL , JAYESH PATEL and others
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD. and SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
