Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Franklin v. Davis
as 1:2017cv00133
Petitioner:
Johnathan Quincy Franklin
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Sharon D. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 9:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Respondent:
Sharon D Allen, John D. Stubblefield, Mitchell D. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 4:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Stephens et al
as 9:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
JP Washington
Defendant:
William Stephens, Gary Curry, Sharon D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-40058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N. RICH, GENE A. KROLL and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 15-40960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N. RICH, GENE A. KROLL and others
Charlie Flentroy v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 15-40516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE FLENTROY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Director of TDCJ-CID, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Deputy Director, RICHARD ALFRED, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Region One Director and others
Stephens v. Aderoju et al
as 9:2014cv00170
Plaintiff:
Deroderic C Stephens
Defendant:
Adebayo A Aderoju, George W Jansky, Jr., Sharon D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flentroy v. Thaler et al
as 9:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charlie Flentroy
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Brad Livingston, Richard Alfred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
