Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Marcellus Jones v. John Wetzel, et al
as 17-3326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBIN LEWIS and SHARON LUQUIS
Wilson v. Griffin et al
as 3:2016cv02071
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
Christine Griffin, Richard Spaide, Sharon Luquis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
Major George Tillery
Defendant:
John Wetzel, John Kerestes, Brenda Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Mutschler v. Brenda Tritt, et al
as 15-2832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY LEE MUTSCHLER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA LYNN TRITT, Facility Manager, MR. A. KOVALVCHIK, Department Superintendent, MS. SHARON LUQUIS, Hearing Examiner and others
Swinson v. SCI-Mahanoy Mental Health Staff Unit Management Team A-blk et al
as 1:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Lydell Swinson
Defendant:
SCI-Mahanoy Mental Health Staff Unit Management Team A-blk, Psychology dept. A-blk, John Doe's Psychology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liddick v. Tritt et al
as 1:2014cv01813
Plaintiff:
Wayne Liddick
Defendant:
Brenda Tritt, Allan Kovalchik, Krah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mutschler v. Tritt et al
as 3:2014cv01611
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Mutschler
Defendant:
Brenda L. Tritt, A. Kovalchik and Sharon Luquis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv03868
Petitioner:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN KERESTES, SHARON LUQUIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv03076
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Mayer, Bisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horan v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Patrick Horan
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Robert MacIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
