Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Birks v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Bobby D. Birks, Jr.
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis and Tyrone Oliver
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madison v. Gillis et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Lawrence Edward Madison
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis and Tyrone Oliver
Other:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Gillis
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
Antonio L. Williams
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. GILLIS
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Respondent:
SHAWN GILLIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Gillis
as 4:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Chaney K. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Gillis
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gillis
as 1:2023cv05207
Petitioner:
Roberto G. Hernandez
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDWARDS v. GILLIS
as 7:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
PHIRRONNIUS EDWARDS
Respondent:
Warden SHAWN GILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00185
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00184
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GLENN v. GILLIS, et al
as 5:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
JAMAL CHE GLENN
Defendant:
SHAWN GILLIS and KENNETH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
