Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jones v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jones
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC and Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie, Brian Dickerson, Joshua Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNichols v. Bradley et al
as 0:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
David Bradley, Ivan Know, Shawn McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shields v. McKenzie
as 1:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Shields, Sr.
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dante' Stone v. James Green, et al
as 23-5031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, JAMES WHITT, Deputy Warden, PAUL CROUCH, Deputy Warden and others
Stone v. Green et al
as 0:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Defendant:
David Green, James Whitt, Paul Crouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Green et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Defendant:
David Green, James Whitt, Paul Crouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. McKenzie
as 3:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Adam Anthony Barker
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. McKenzie
as 0:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Adam Anthony Barker
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaballah v. McKenzie
as 3:2022cv00464
Petitioner:
Conrai Andre Kaballah
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
