Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Babeneau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregory v. Slovin & Associates Co., L.P.A.
as 3:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Shelley Gregory
Defendant:
Slovin & Associates Co., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01259
Plaintiff:
Shelley Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Commissioner for Social Security
as 2:2022cv02516
Plaintiff:
Shelley Renee Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner for Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Patchen et al v. Fidelity Investments
as 3:2022cv00980
Plaintiff:
Shelley Patchen and Karen Lonz
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Shephard v. Shephard et al
as 3:2022cv00076
Defendant:
Shelly Dallas Shephard, Distaney Hawes, Shelley Dallas Shephard and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo D. Shephard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Avery et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Stacy Avery and Shelley Avery
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herring v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Shelley Herring
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
