Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Shepherd v. Owens
as 1:2024cv04564
Petitioner:
Jason Cortez Shepherd
Respondent:
Craig Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepherd v. Owens
as 1:2024cv04565
Petitioner:
Jason Cortez Shepherd
Respondent:
Craig Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepherd v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv04465
Defendant:
XYZ Entity, Mayhew Trucking LLC and Duprell Michael Williams
Plaintiff:
Russell Edward Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DAKER v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02687
Respondent:
Otis Stanton, Brian Dennis Adams, Justin Jones and others
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Defendant:
MD Du, MD Pise, Shepherd and others
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Poole et al
as 1:2023cv03704
Plaintiff:
Kingstate Bey
Defendant:
Officer Alex Poole, Norcross Police Department, Norcross Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
