Cases 51 - 60 of 2,009
SHEPPARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22321
Plaintiff:
NATHAN SHEPPARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHEPPARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24568
Plaintiff:
IVERY SHEPPARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Skerritt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04927
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Skerritt, Yolanda Johnson, Charles Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
SHEPPARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08450
Plaintiff:
JEREMY SHEA SHEPPARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilhelm v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman and others
Carlisle v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02503
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman and others
USA v. Alexander Sheppard
as 23-3164
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alexander Sheppard
Le v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08364
Plaintiff:
Phuong Le
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., William Johnson, Todd Lachman and others
Bushansky v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08321
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., Todd R. Lachman, Neha U. Mathur and others
SHEPPARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04823
Plaintiff:
SUSAN SHEPPARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
