Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Jason Davis v. Sherry Yates, et al
as 15-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY YATES and SARAH DAVIS, in both their individual and official capacities
WHITE v. KAMINSKI et al
as 2:2015cv01237
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WHITE
Defendant:
TRACEY S. KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN, J. OTTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHEMELIA v. KAMINSKI et al
as 2:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCHEMELIA
Defendant:
TRACEY S. KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN, J. OTTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. YATES et al
as 1:2015cv00951
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EDWARDS
Defendant:
SHERRY YATES, GARY FLANIGAN, STATE OF NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLETCHER et al v. YATES et al
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
KEITH FLETCHER, MICHAEL RIDLEY, KEVIN WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
SHERRY YATES, MERREL MAIN, GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZALAZAR v. KAMINSKI et al
as 2:2014cv08132
Plaintiff:
JUAN ZALAZAR
Defendant:
STACEY KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN, SUSAN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. YATES et al
as 2:2014cv08075
Petitioner:
JAVIER RAMIREZ
Respondent:
SHERRY YATES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOSS et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2014cv05771
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE BOSS, DONNELI WOLFE, THADDEUS THOMAS and others
Defendant:
S. DAVIS, S. KAMINSKI, MERRIL MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. YATES et al
as 1:2014cv04799
Petitioner:
THEODORE L. CLARK, JR.
Respondent:
SHERRY YATES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AUSTIN v. YATES et al
as 2:2014cv03411
Plaintiff:
CURTIS J. AUSTIN
Defendant:
SHERRY YATES, T. ORANGE, TRACEY S. KAMINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
