Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Joseph Jay v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 15-3148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SHIRLEY SMEAL, Executive Deputy Secretary of PA. DOC, DAN CARO, Staff Assistant (Western Region) and others
Pew v. Huber et al
as 3:2015cv01407
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Huber, Sneck, Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Bryan Angle v. Shirley Smeal, et al
as 14-3948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN ANGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDS SHIRLEY SMEAL
Alfonso Pew v. Joanne Torma, et al
as 14-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
Marcellus Jones v. Sec PA Dept Corr, et al
as 14-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TABB BICKELL, SHIRLEY SMEAL and others
Jeffrey Thompson v. Shirley Moore Smeal, et al
as 12-2371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, Acting Secretary of Corrections, ANDREA PRIORI-MEINTEL, Director Bureau of Treatment Services and ULLI KLEMM, Administrator for Religion and Volunteer Services
Ronald Rines v. Warden Allenwood, et al
as 12-2278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD RINES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SHIRLEY SMEAL, Secretary Department of Corrections
In Re: Rhonshawn Jackson, et al
as 12-1657
Petitioner:
RHONSHAWN JACKSON
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY SMEAL, LAWLER and others
Eric Maple v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 12-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC LAMONT MAPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, SUPERINTENDANT ALBION STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and SHIRLEY SMEAL
Alfonso Pew v. John Wetzel, et al
as 11-4531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW, a/k/a Sehu-Kessa-Saa Tabansi
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY SMEAL, JOHN MURRAY, Deputy Secretary Central Region and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
