Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
SHOOK v. BENTON
as 2:2022cv00002
Petitioner:
DANNY SHOOK
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Benton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHOOK v. BENTON
as 5:2021cv00466
Petitioner:
DANNY SHOOK
Respondent:
WARDEN BENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LASTER v. CITY OF ATLANTA et al
as 1:2021cv04169
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Felicia A Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LASTER v. CITY OF ATLANTA et al
as 1:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTA, KEISHA LANCE BOTTOMS, FELICIA A MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company v. Giddens et al
as 1:2021cv02097
Plaintiff:
Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company, Travelers Property and Casualty Insurance Company, William Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
RHB, LLC et al v. Atlanta City Counsel et al
as 1:2020cv01301
Defendant:
Andrea L. Boone, Jennifer N. Ide, Michael Julian Bond and others
Plaintiff:
Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete, LLC and RHB, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Brock Built Homes, LLC
Respondent:
Amir R Farokhi, Andrea L Boone, Joyce M Sheperd and others
Shook v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00062
Plaintiff:
Lloyd L. Shook
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shook v. Looklive, Inc.
as 1:2019cv05096
Defendant:
Looklive, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derek Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Shook v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv02010
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Shook
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
