Cases 11 - 20 of 218
ARAYA v. MITCHELL
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
ISAAK SIMON ARAYA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, JUSTIN R. MITCHELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
KENNY v. SIMON
as 1:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN KENNY
Defendant:
MARIA SIMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ARAYA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
ISAAK SIMON ARAYA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Simon Kinsella v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, et al
as 22-5316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Simon V. Kinsella
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Amanda Lefton, in her official capacity as Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, James F. Bennett, in his official capacity, working for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
South Fork Wind, LLC
DICKSON v. BISNOTT et al
as 1:2022cv03047
Plaintiff:
SIMONE DICKSON
Defendant:
BRITTANY BISNOTT and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DICKSON v. VANHOUSEN et al
as 1:2022cv02731
Plaintiff:
SIMONE DICKSON
Defendant:
MR. & MRS. VANHOUSEN, REBECCA LAURALIE KIRCHMAN, SCHENECTADY COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKSON v. MELIUS et al
as 1:2022cv02363
Plaintiff:
SIMONE DICKSON
Defendant:
DAVID MELIUS, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVCIES, DEANNA ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
