Cases 1 - 10 of 72
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2023cv05044
Petitioner:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Respondent:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, HERBERT VINCE RODVILL, MARJORIE P. SIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Srvs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MARSHALL et al v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2021cv04336
Lead Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS M. MARSHALL
Plaintiff:
SIMON CAMPBELL, ROBERT ABRAMS, TIMOTHY DALY and others
Defendant:
SOLICITOR MICHAEL P. CLARKE, PENNSBURY SCHOOL DISTRICT, CHERRISSA GIBSON and others
Petitioner:
Free to Learn Coalition and HAROLD P. KUPERMIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRACKEN v. BLEI et al
as 2:2021cv02187
Defendant:
PATRICK MOLLOY, JACQUELINE MCCRACKEN BLEI, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
