Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In re: New York City Board of
as 21-1837
Plaintiff:
Elsa Gulino, Mayling Ralph, Peter Wilds and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Corinthian Sistrunk
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
In re: New York City Board
as 20-906
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Nia Greene, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,, Elsa Gulino and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Keesha Sistrunk
Sistrunk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv02046
Plaintiff:
Corey Sistrunk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Sistrunk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv03208
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Deborah Sistrunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sistrunk v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06144
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Stacey Sistrunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sistrunk v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 11-3377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald Sistrunk
Defendant - Appellee:
Eli Lilly and Company
Sistrunk v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2011cv02185
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff:
Reginald Sistrunk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Imbeault v. Rick's Caberet International, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv04425
Plaintiff:
William Imbeault, William Imbeault and William Imbeault
Defendant:
Rick's Caberet International, Inc, RCI Entertainment (New York) Inc., Peregrine Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
